Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think its obvious thats its number 2. Is that set a pokemon spinoff/free comercially? Since it doesn't look the same as the old ds graphics from memory.

Posted

I'm actually going against the flow here, but it's a good ol' 1 for me, especially if it's supposed to look pokemon-ish.

 

Truth to be told, both looks great and i'd rather use the second myself for a more classic RPG game - and it seem more detailled - but for a pokemon-like game, definitely the first one (more cartoon-ish).

 

PS : beside, after comparing the two, i can't help but think that the sprite doesn't "belong" to the second one ... it might be just me though ...

Posted

Well, I have to go with 1 as well. I personally only choose 1 because it looks more unique. The second one looks way to much like pokemon but if that's what you're aiming for then I guess 2 works. I've always just been more of a fan of unique art, even if it isn't professional quality. Hope that makes sense...

Posted
21 minutes ago, jcsnider said:

I don't think that one should even be up for consideration. 

Curious, why not? Its not like he cares about licencing if he's making a fan based game?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...